Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) She would win so long as the store cannot prove that Clara knew Harold was just giving his opinion.
B) She would win so long as she can prove that she did not know that Harold was only giving his opinion.
C) She may rely on the statement and win because it was made by Harold in his capacity as a manager, not by an uninformed sales clerk.
D) She would lose because Harold was only expressing his opinion.
E) She would lose because a consumer good was involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because unless Clara had a written promise specifically providing for a warranty, the computer was sold without a warranty.
B) Yes, because unless Clara had an oral promise specifically promising a warranty or a written contract specifically providing for a warranty, the computer was sold without a warranty.
C) No, because the computer was sold with a warranty of merchantability.
D) No, because the computer was sold with a warranty of merchantability and also with a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
E) No, because the computer was sold with a warranty of merchantability, with a warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and also with an express warranty.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 65 of 65
Related Exams